Glamour model reveals reason she had new design
Sunday, 19 October 2008
Jodie Marsh has admitted she wants guys to be attracted to her new body art.
In reality TV show London Ink, the glamour model, 29, is shown getting a sultry female inked on her arm while talking through the reasoning behind her choice.
‘What I wanted is that when men look at her they fancy her,’ she explains. ‘She’s a combination of me, Pamela Anderson, Dolly Parton and Princess Diana.
‘I love her. She symbolises al things glamorous and sexy and that’s exactly what I wanted.’
Jodie has numerous tattoos all over her body including portraits of Michael Jackson and Chuck Berry.
London Ink begins on today on Discovery Real Time.
SEE VIDEO Jodie Marsh gets new tattoo on London Ink...
SEE VIDEO Trailer for new series of London Ink...
PHOTO QUIZ Guess the celebrity tattoos >>
SHOCKING PICTURES Amy Winehouse from sexy diva to scrawny scrap>>
Rate this!
Star rating:
IPC Media Limited, owner of nowmagazine.co.uk, will collect the address of the recipient solely to process your requests.
Tattoos CAN be sexy!
i used to think jodie got an unfair press...but i think lately she is not helping herself!! Why oh why would you get a tatoo to hope men would fancy the woman on the tatoo rather than improve her style and get a decent man to fancy her for herself...i think as a woman if she laid off the eye make up she is a very gorgeous girl...in her wedding programe in her dress i thought she looked the best i have ever seen her, very natural, but its a shame that she appears ballsy and full of confidence but infact she is the opposite and just does not want to show her true self for being hurt!! Come on Jodie a man should fancy ur face not ur tats!!!
apart frommaking a show of her self what else is she famous for she is annoying and embarassing to the women race so get a life love and help us to like ya
NO OTHER WORD DESCRIBES JODY MSRSH EX SAD,SHE REALY NEEDS 2 GET A LIFE,SHE MOANS WAT PEOPLE SAY BOUT HER BUT COME ON WAT DOES SHE EXPECT !!!
© Copyright nowmagazine.co.uk 2009
Comments
4 comments