Actor said to be seeking full custody of daughters
Monday, 28 July 2008
Charlie Sheen is said to be furious with ex-wife Denise Richards after she falsely accused him of molesting their daughters.
The former James Bond girl, 37, made the claims at a court last week and showed a video of Sam, 4, and Lola, 3, allegedly behaving in a disturbed way with their dad.
But Charlie's lawyers presented his own film of the girls acting normally to the hearing in LA, and Denise's 'evidence' was dismissed.
It is thought the actor now plans to fight for full custody of his kids, and will sue Denise for defamation.
‘Denise's accusations were vile,’ a source tells Page Six. ‘She was basically trying to say Charlie [manipulated] the kids and acted inappropriately with them. It's disgusting and totally untrue.
'Charlie is furious... Denise has really pushed it too far this time.’
Reps for the pair, who split in 2005 after 3 years of marriage, declined to comment.
Charlie, 43, is now wed to property developer Brooke Mueller.
Rate this!
Star rating:
IPC Media Limited, owner of nowmagazine.co.uk, will collect the address of the recipient solely to process your requests.
One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in “acting out” behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Until any of you at this board are FORENSIC experts, you have no expertise to make any comments. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism, cruel as well as sexually inappropriate emails he has sent to the mother of his children) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the “woman scorned” because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, “inconclusive” or “unsubstantiated” does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn’t enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn’t Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi.
We reveal all about the feisty contestant’s greatest assets
© Copyright nowmagazine.co.uk 2009
Comments
1 comments